Thompson v. Namale West, Inc.
Namale West, Inc., Anthony Robbins & Associates, Inc. and The Anthony Roberts Foundation, Inc. (collectively Defendants) appeal from an order denying their motion to compel Karen Thompson to arbitrate her claims against them under an arbitration clause contained in a registration form signed by her traveling companion. Defendants claim the trial court erred in denying their motion because Thompson's companion had the authority to agree to the provision as her agent. Alternatively, they claim that Thompson was bound by the provision as a third party beneficiary to the agreement. Court reject Defendants' arguments and affirm the order.
Comments on Thompson v. Namale West, Inc.