legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A. N.
Appellant S. M., mother of A. N. (minor),[1]appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating reunification services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.21, subd. (f) & 395.)[2] Appellant contends: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile courts finding that reasonable services were offered to her; (2) the juvenile court abused its discretion when it terminated reunification services; (3) appellants failure to object to the reasonable services finding does not preclude this court from considering the issue on appeal; and (4) any failure to object to the reasonable services finding was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel. Court affirm the juvenile courts orders as they relate to the minor, and strike the remainder of appellants claims related to S. C.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale