P. v. Hekmat
Appellant was convicted of receiving stolen property, as well as possessing methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia, and received a two-year prison sentence. He challenges the receiving count on the basis the court failed to instruct the jury it had to unanimously agree as to which item of stolen property he received. He also contends the possession counts must be reversed due to insufficient evidence and instructional error. Finding no basis to disturb the judgment, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hekmat