P. v. Borba
Defendant John Joe Borba appeals from the sentence executed after a finding he violated probation. He contends the trial court increased his sentence upon recall, imposed duplicate restitution fines, and imposed a drug program fee which had not been imposed at the time his probation was revoked. We disagree and affirm the judgment. Defendant also argues the abstract of judgment is erroneous. On this last point, Court agree and will direct that the abstract of judgment be corrected.
Comments on P. v. Borba