P. v. Camacho
The jury convicted defendant Michael Rudolph Camacho of failing to register as a sex offender. (Former Pen. Code, 290, subd. (a)(1)(A).)[1] Defendant contends on appeal that: (1) his right to due process under the federal and state Constitutions was violated by a 10-month delay between his arrest in another county for a related parole violation and the filing of this case in Los Angeles County for a section 290 violation; (2) the trial court should have declared a mistrial on its own motion for juror misconduct or, alternatively, his attorney was ineffective in addressing the misconduct issue; and (3) his pretrial statement elicited in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 was inadmissible. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Camacho