legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.O.
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, 300 et seq.),[1]B.C., the mother of the minor children C.O., A.C., and K.C., (Mother, C.O., A.C., and K.C., respectively), appeals from an order that (1) terminated the home of parent orders that allowed A.C. and K.C. to remain in her care, and (2) removed the minors from her custody and placed them in foster care. A.C. and K.C. have also appealed from that order. The appellants challenge the jurisdiction and disposition determinations made by the dependency court in its determination of a section 387 supplemental petition. Court find that substantial evidence supports the trial courts determinations, and that the courts failure to make certain findings is harmless error. Court therefore affirm the order from which Mother and the minors have appealed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale