In re K.W.
Father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights with respect to two children pursuant to section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.[1] He contends that the court erred by denying him an evidentiary hearing on his request for reunification services pursuant to section 388. The request was based in part upon the assertion that he did not receive notice of the proceedings until after the section 366.26 hearing had been set. Plaintiff, San Bernardino County Department of Childrens Services (DCS), argues that father was given a hearing that complied with the requirements of section 388, and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition. Court hold that father has failed to show any prejudicial error in the conduct of the hearing and that the denial of the petition was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Court affirm.
Comments on In re K.W.