legal news


Register | Forgot Password

M.R. v. Super. Ct.
In dependency proceedings involving five of their children, M.R. (father) and R.W. (mother) each seek writ review (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452; Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (l)) of a June 30, 2008 order setting for October 27, 2008, a permanency planning hearing for three of the children, daughters M.C. and M.G. and son M., who are in foster care. Neither parent disputes the order as to the eldest and second youngest children, sons M. Jr. and J., who were ordered to remain placed with mother. Having consolidated the parents petitions, we now deny them on the merits. The petitions are denied on the merits (Cal. Const., art. VI, 14; Kowis v. Howard (1992) 3 Cal.4th 888 [barring subsequent challenges by appeal]; 366.26, subd. (l)(1)); given the imminency of the permanency planning hearing set for October 27, 2008, our decision is final as to this court immediately (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(3)).


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale