Marriage of Murguia
Tamio Onishi appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a 1998 default judgment entered against him. Onishi and Ricardo Ramirez appeal from the portion of the order filed on December 12, 2006, awarding attorneys fees to respondents Mary Murguia and Frank Murguia pursuant to Family Code section 271. They also appeal from the temporary order vacating and expunging the acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment. On appeal, Onishi contends that the judgment entered against him is void on numerous grounds and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. Onishi and Ramirez contend: (1) the order vacating the satisfaction of judgment is void; (2) the trial court erred in striking their testimony; and (3) the award of attorneys fees deprived them of due process of law. Court affirm the order, which was filed on December 12, 2006, denying the motion to set aside the 1998 default judgment and awarding attorneys fees. Court also dismiss the appeal from the temporary order, which was filed on April 3, 2006, vacating and expunging the acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment.
Comments on Marriage of Murguia