legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ramirez
Rudy Guadalupe Ramirez appeals from a judgment entered upon his convictions by jury of attempted carjacking (Pen. Code, 664/215, subd. (a), count 1)[1]attempted robbery ( 664/211, count 2) and possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11377, subd. (a), count 3). The trial court sentenced him to the low term of 18 months on count 1 and to one-third the midterm, or eight months, on count 3, to be served consecutively. It also imposed the midterm of two years on count 2 and stayed execution pursuant to section 654. Appellant contends that imposition of consecutive sentences on counts 1 and 3 violated his right to a jury trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as set forth in Apprendi v. New Jersey(2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. Washington(2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely). Court affirm.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale