legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Coates
William John Coates (defendant) appeals his conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, 288.5, subd. (a)), and committing a lewd act upon a 14-year-old child (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (c)(1)). In a bifurcated proceeding the court also found true an allegation that defendant had a prior strike conviction. (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)(d); 667, subd. (b).) The court denied a motion to strike the prior conviction, and sentenced defendant to 24 years in prison.
Defendant contends: (1) the court abused its discretion by admitting expert testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS); (2) evidence Code section 1108[1] is unconstitutional on its face and as applied: (3) the court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of similar uncharged conduct, and the admission of this evidence resulted in a due process violation; (4) in violation of his federal constitutional right to due process, CALJIC Nos. 2.50.01, 2.50.1 and 2.50.2 permit the jury to find defendant guilty based upon a fact not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; (5) the trial court abused its discretion by denying defendants motion to strike his prior conviction; and (6) the no contact order should be modified or stricken because the victim is now 18.Court find no error, and shall affirm the judgment.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale