legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.R.
Appellant G.S. (mother) appeals from the juvenile courts orders terminating her parental rights to her daughters A.R. and G.R. at a hearing held on April 29, 2008, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26.[1] Mother argues: 1) the juvenile court erred in finding the children adoptable because they have a strong bond with their three siblings; and 2) the court erred when it found that the parental benefit exception to adoption does not apply. The childrens father, E.R., (father) joins in this appeal, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.200(a)(5). As discussed below, Court reject these arguments and affirm the juvenile courts orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale