County of Sacramento v. Llanes
Defendant Guadalupe Llanes appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a judgment of paternity as untimely. He contends his motion was timely. Alternatively, he argues plaintiff County of Sacramento (County) should be estopped from asserting the motion is untimely because the California Department of Child Support Services (CDCSS) posted letters on its website stating that previously established fathers, such as defendant, had until December 31, 2006, to file a motion to set aside a judgment of paternity, and he relied on those letters in filing his motion on December 29, 2006. Defendant also seeks to challenge a finding by the child support commissioner that he was estopped from obtaining the relief he requests . . . .
As Court explain, the only issue that is properly before us is whether the trial court erred in determining defendants motion to aside a judgment of paternity was untimely. Finding no error, Court affirm the trial courts order.
Comments on County of Sacramento v. Llanes