Bisbee v. Pate
This appeal from an order setting aside a default and default judgment borders on the frivolous.[1] Respondent Pate is apparently one of several business associates involved in a deal to market certain previously unpublished Zane Grey manuscripts. According to the complaint (which was not included in the clerks transcript but which Pate put into the record in a successful motion to augment), Pate and her co-defendants allegedly failed to do their part to market the manuscripts (and certain other Zane Grey memorabilia), despite receiving over $20,400 to do so from appellant Bisbee. The order is thus affirmed.
Comments on Bisbee v. Pate