Cason v. Child and Family Institute
In this action for discrimination and harassment under the California Fair Employment Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, 12900 et seq.),[1]plaintiff Tamara Cason appeals from a postjudgment order granting the motion of defendants Child and Family Institute (CFI) and Michael Dougherty for attorney fees pursuant to section 12965, subdivision (b). Despite the abysmal quality of Casons briefs, Court shall reverse the trial courts order and remand for further proceedings because the trial court clearly erred in failing to make any written findings in support of its fee award. (Rosenman v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 859, 867-868 (Rosenman).)
Comments on Cason v. Child and Family Institute