legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Matrix Motor Co. v. City of Ridgecrest
Appellant Matrix Motor Co., Inc. (Matrix) sued respondent Ridgecrest Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) for specific performance, breach of contract, declaratory relief, quiet title and mandamus. The Agency demurred to all causes of action and the trial court granted the demurrer on the grounds that Matrixs complaint did not comply with the Government Claims Act and was barred by the statute of frauds. On appeal, Matrix argues that the trial court erred in granting the demurrer because Matrix did properly file a claim with the Agency before commencing any action and because Matrixs contractual claims were rooted in a written and signed agreement between the parties. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale