P. v. Duncan
A jury convicted appellants Dolores Marie Duncan and Cruz D. Martinez (collectively, appellants) of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, 459, 460, subd. (b)). On appeal, Duncan contends the trial court erred in admitting incriminating statements she made to a law enforcement officer without being advised of her rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436. Martinez argues that the court erroneously instructed the jury regarding burglary and theft. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Duncan