legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.M.
The Alameda County Social Services Agency (agency) filed a petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300[1]on behalf of T.M., the son of Katie M. (mother). T.M. was removed from mothers home and placed with his father. Subsequently, the court terminated mothers reunification services. Agency filed a second petition after father was incarcerated for child endangerment and, at the jurisdiction and disposition hearing, mother requested that T.M. visit her once in November 2007 and once in December 2007 at the state prison where she was incarcerated. The court ruled that the decision whether to have T.M. visit mother in prison was within the agencys discretion. On appeal, mother contends that the lower court improperly delegated its authority on visitation to the agency. Court conclude that this appeal is moot and therefore dismiss it.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale