Hearn v. Hearn
Ten years after a judgment of dissolution was entered ending the marriage of petitioner and appellant Lorie Ann Hearn (Lorie) and defendant and respondent Mark A. Hearn (Mark), Lorie filed a motion to set aside the judgment on the ground that Mark obtained the judgment fraudulently by forging her signature on the judgment.[1] The trial court denied the motion, finding that it was not brought within one year of the date Lorie knew or should have known of the fraud as required by Family Code section 2122, subdivision (a). On appeal, Lorie challenges the trial courts finding that her motion was not timely. Court affirm.
Comments on Hearn v. Hearn