Hecht v. The Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.
Michael A. Hecht appeals from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of his disability carrier. The trial court, relying on Erreca v. West. States Life Ins. Co. (1942) 19 Cal.2d 388, ruled that there were no triable issues of fact and that appellant was not "totally" disabled. Given the state of the record and appellant's concessions that certain facts are undisputed, Court affirm. Our standard of review is de novo. (Artiglio v. Corning Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 604, 612.)
Comments on Hecht v. The Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.