P. v. Shaisi
Defendant Ali Reza Shaisi[1] was convicted of 15 criminal offenses arising from two distinct instances of alleged shoplifting occurring some four months apart. On appeal he contends among other things that the trial court erred by consolidating the charges arising from the two incidents. He contends that the evidence of the earlier offenses was considerably weaker than that of the later offenses, and was unfairly bolstered by the latter, which would not have been admissible in a separate trial of the former. Court reject this and several other contentions, and affirm the judgment of conviction.
Comments on P. v. Shaisi