P. v. Artieres
Marc L. Artieres was convicted of several charges relating to the illegal possession of drugs and firearms. He claims prejudicial error occurred during his trial: that the evidence did not support his conviction under Health and Safety Code section 11370.1, and the trial court improperly admitted certain hearsay evidence. He further claims there were several sentencing errors: an imposition of dual punishment for the same offense in violation of Penal Code section 654, an imposition of excessive court security fees, and a failure to allow him proper credit for time served prior to sentencing. As discussed below, the Attorney General conceded error in the imposition of court security fees and the calculation of actual time credit, and Court direct modification of the judgment accordingly. In all other respects, we find no prejudicial error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Artieres