legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Jessen v. Yeh
Plaintiff Rodney W. Jessen and defendant Oie Lian Yeh entered into an agreement settling Jessens personal injury claim against Yeh for $25,000. Shortly thereafter, Jessen attempted to rescind the agreement when he learned that he did not also have a claim against his mothers underinsured motorist policy. Yeh refused to accept the rescission and filed a motion to enforce the settlement. (Code Civ. Proc., 664.6.) Jessen opposed, raising his mistake of fact as a defense. The trial court rejected the defense and enforced the agreement. Jessen argues on appeal that, given the undisputed facts of this case, he is entitled to rescission as a matter of law. Court disagree and affirm the judgment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale