Watson v. Kunda
Ed and Judith Kunda (the Kundas) appeal from an order amending a judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., 904.1, subd. (a)(2).) They contend that the alleged error in the October 11, 2006 judgment was not clerical and could not be corrected. They also contend that the trial court erroneously (1) granted an easement over their property to Ernest and Deirdre Watson (the Watsons), and (2) denied their request for injunctive relief to abate a nuisance created by the Watsons. Court affirm the trial court's order because the 2006 judgment was signed and prepared without reference to, and completely opposite of, the trial court's ruling that the Kundas had trespassed on the Watsons' property. This was a clerical error. Court also conclude that the Kundas are barred from seeking appellate review of the easement and injunctive relief issues because they did not timely appeal from the original judgment.
Comments on Watson v. Kunda