legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.V.
In these consolidated cases, father appeals from the jurisdictional and dispositional orders of the juvenile court as to C.V., his son by Y.R., and as to his daughter A.L., and sons A.L.2 and J.L., his children by E.B.[1] Father contends (1) no reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for detaining the children from his care, (2) the juvenile court erred in sustaining allegations under Welfare and Institutions Code[2]section 300 as to father, (3) there was no sufficient evidence to support the courts declaring the children dependents of the court or the orders removing them from fathers custody, and (4) the children should have been returned home to father, rather than suitably placed. Court affirm, finding the juvenile court properly exercised jurisdiction over the children and substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts orders removing the children from fathers care.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale