In re R.L.
C.L. (mother) appeals from orders of the juvenile court order denying a modification petition, terminating parental rights to her daughter, R.L., and establishing adoption as a permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388, 366.26.)[1] The minor's alleged father, O.A., is not a party to this appeal. Mother contends that the juvenile court erred in terminating reunification services and in finding that the parental exception to adoption did not apply. She also claims that the Ventura County Human Services Agency (HSA) failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Court affirm.
Comments on In re R.L.