L.L. v. Super. Ct.
Appellant L. L. (father) challenges the juvenile courts order terminating reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section[1]366.26 hearing for the selection of a permanent plan for his son L. L.-U. (L.). Father challenges the juvenile courts finding that it would be detrimental to place L. in his care, and its finding that father had been provided with reasonable reunification services by real party Monterey County Department of Social & Employment Services (the Department). Court conclude that both findings are supported by substantial evidence and deny the petition.
Comments on L.L. v. Super. Ct.