Kast v. Antonsson
In her handwritten brief, appellant Anna Karin Antonsson, acting in propria persona, argues that the trial court erred in refusing to order a child custody evaluation pursuant to Family Code section 3111, subdivision (a). As in her previous appeal, no basis exists for reversal because appellant fails to support her assertions of error with legal argument or analysis. Consequently, Court affirm.
Comments on Kast v. Antonsson