S.C. v. Super. Ct.
Petitioner S.C. was the legal guardian of T.P., born October 1994. After a lengthy jurisdiction hearing with much conflicting evidence, the juvenile court found T.P. was a child described by section 300, subdivision (b), of the Welfare and Institutions Code and terminated the guardianship.[1] The courts ruling was based upon its finding that petitioner had (1) failed adequately to supervise T.P., and (2) allowed an unrelated foster child with an interest in pornography unlimited access to a home computer. Petitioner challenges the ruling under section 300, subdivision (b), claiming there is no substantial evidence to support it. Court disagree and deny the petition.
Comments on S.C. v. Super. Ct.