In re Jasmine R.
E.M. (mother) appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights as to her daughters Jasmine R. and Jennifer R. She relies on the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(ii)[1]exception, claiming the court erred in failing to ascertain the wishes of Jasmine, who was 12 years old at the time of the section 366.26 hearing. Substantial evidence supports the courts implied finding that the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(ii) exception was inapplicable. Mother has failed to meet her burden to show that exception applies. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Jasmine R.