P. v. Griffin
Prentiss Griffin appeals from the judgment entered after his murder conviction, contending that a prosecution witness who testified after refusing to take the oath and declined to identify Griffin as the perpetrator was improperly impeached with a prior inconsistent statement where he did identify Griffin. Because any objection based on the witnesss failure to take the oath was waived, Court affirm, but modify the judgment to correct a sentencing error.
Comments on P. v. Griffin