P. v. Sarabia
Arnulfo Sarabia appeals from his convictions of multiple counts of second degree robbery, possession of methamphetamine, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence identifying him as a perpetrator of the robberies, and argues the trial court erred in denying his request for an eyewitness identification expert. Respondent argues the trial court erred in failing to impose the mandatory court security fine for each conviction.
Comments on P. v. Sarabia