P. v. Gomez
This is an appeal from judgment entered after a jury found defendant Joel Gomez guilty of multiple sex crimes. Defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing to conduct additional competency proceedings immediately before the trial. In addition, defendant contends the court used the wrong burden of proof to determine that he waived his Miranda rights (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436), that the court inadequately instructed the jury, and that the court erred in denying defendants Wheeler/Batson motion (see Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79; People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258). Finding no prejudicial error, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gomez