In re G.F.
Minor G. F., a ward of the court, contends his statements to the police concerning his active criminal street gang participation should have been excluded because he was not warned pursuant to Mirandav. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). But any error in admitting the statements was harmless because ample admissible evidence showed his active gang participation. Court affirm.
Comments on In re G.F.