In re R.B.
L.C. (mother) appeals from the December 10, 2007 judgment declaring her children R.B., born in 1997, K.B., born in 1998, and S.B., born in 2003, dependents of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300.[1] Mother contends: (1) substantial evidence does not support the sustained jurisdictional allegations; (2) the amendment of the petition to conform to proof violated due process; and (3) substantial evidence does not support the dispositional order removing the children from her custody. We hold that substantial evidence supports the dependency courts jurisdiction, mother forfeited her due process contention by failing to object below, and in any event, due process was not violated. Court affirm.
Comments on In re R.B.