legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.S.
N. C. (mother) appeals following the order terminating parental rights as to two of her children, R.S. (born May 2001) and J.S. (born December 2002).[1] Contrary to mothers contentions: (1) the notice requirement of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.; hereinafter, ICWA) was satisfied because the requested return receipt of the notice to the tribes (25 U.S.C. 1912, subd (a); Welf. & Inst. Code, 224.2, subds. (a)(1), (c)) was ultimately received by the court; and (2) the juvenile court did not abuse its broad discretion when it denied mothers section 388 petition after a full evidentiary hearing. The order under review is affirmed.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale