In re D.S.
D.S. appeals from the juvenile courts order continuing wardship and ordering him into a short term camp community placement program. D.S. contends: (1) the courts finding he had possessed marijuana for sale was not supported by sufficient evidence; (2) the upper term should not have been used to calculate the maximum period of physical confinement in light of Cunningham v.California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham); the award of predisposition custody credit was miscalculated; and one of the probation conditions imposed was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Finding there was sufficient evidence to support the finding, Court affirm the order as modified.
Comments on In re D.S.