legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hammond
Leon Dwight Hammond (appellant) appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a)) and a court trial in which he was found to have suffered one prior conviction within the meaning of the Three Strikes Law (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), and 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and served three prior prison terms within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). He was sentenced to eight years in prison. He appeals, contending that his constitutional rights were violated when the court excluded third-party culpability evidence, and his counsels failure to object to the prosecutors closing argument constituted ineffective assistance. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale