In re A.P.
A.P. (appellant) appeals from the order continuing him as a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602)[1]after a finding that he had committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211) and placing him in the short-term camp program. The juvenile court made the additional finding that the maximum theoretical term of confinement was five years eight months.
Appellant contends that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of second degree robbery as he lacked the larcenous intent that is an element of robbery; and (2) the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering him placed in the short-term camp program.
Comments on In re A.P.