legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dignam
Defendant Charles William Dignam pleaded guilty to misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance and misdemeanor possession of controlled substance paraphernalia after the trial court denied (1) his motion to dismiss under Penal Code section 995, challenging the denial of his motion to suppress at the preliminary hearing, and (2) his renewed motion to suppress under Penal Code section 1538.5.
As the record does not show the officers detention of defendant was supported by a reasonable suspicion, an issue uncontested by the Attorney General, the trial court erred by denying defendants motion to suppress.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale