In re A.A.
D.A. appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to two of her children and an order establishing a legal guardianship as the permanent plan for a third child. She contends, in the early stages of the childrens dependency, the superior court should have found her incompetent and appointed a guardian ad litem to represent her interests. Alternatively, she argues her trial counsel was ineffective for not raising the issue. On review, Court affirm.
Comments on In re A.A.