legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.S.
C.S. is the mother of four children who have been dependents of the juvenile court since early 2006 and with whom she failed to reunify. At a permanency planning hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) earlier this year, the court denied the mothers petition ( 388) to regain custody of her children. The court also found termination of parental rights would not be detrimental to the children but calendared a further section 366.26 hearing because although they had a probability for adoption, there was as yet no identified or available adoptive home for them. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(3).) On appeal, the mother challenges the courts denial of her modification petition and no-detriment finding. On review, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale