In re Michael K.
After Michael K. admitted to possessing stolen property, the trial court held a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 730.6[1]and ordered the minor to pay $2,982.96 in restitution. Michael contends that order was not supported by substantial evidence because the victim's testimony regarding the items stolen from her home and the costs to replace them was "vague and speculative." Because we conclude there is substantial evidence in the record to support the restitution order, Court affirm.
Comments on In re Michael K.