Chavez v. City of LA
Robert Chavez appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court granted the City of Los Angeless motion for summary adjudication of his claims for disability discrimination, retaliation and harassment in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, 12900 et seq.)[1]and later granted a motion for summary judgment, resolving the remaining claims against the City and Dr. Shirley St. Peter, an occupational psychologist in the Citys Medical Services Division. Chavez contends triable issues of material fact exist as to each of his FEHA claims as well as his common law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Court affirm the judgment as to St. Peter, but reverse as to the City because triable issues of material fact exist in connection with Chavezs retaliation claim.
Comments on Chavez v. City of LA