P. v. Rutledge
Appellant Eugene Darrell Rutledge (appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of nine counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211)[1]and one count of attempted second degree robbery ( 211/664). Appellant argues the trial court erred in admitting and considering testimony and in-court identifications that were tainted by an impermissibly suggestive lineup.
Comments on P. v. Rutledge