Dale I. v. Super. Ct.
Dale I. challenges, by writ petition, the juvenile courts decision to set a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]hearing regarding his son B. He contends: (1) the juvenile court erred when it determined that there would be a substantial risk of detriment to B. if he were returned to petitioners custody; (2) the juvenile court erred when it determined that petitioner was offered reasonable reunification services; and (3) the trial court abused its discretion when it reduced petitioners visitation. For the reasons stated below, the petition is denied.
Comments on Dale I. v. Super. Ct.