Earls v. Lee
Mari-Lynne Earls (Earls) appeals an order, filed August 3, 2006, granting her neighbor Elizabeth Lees (Lee) petition for an injunction against Earls pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6.[1] The court also denied Earls petition for similar relief against Lee, ruled that Lee was not in contempt of any court order, and provided that a prior temporary restraining order against Lee, if it was still in effect, should be dissolved. The court further provided that Lee was the prevailing party for the purpose of an attorney fee award. Court shall hold that the first two procedural claims of error are without merit because they are based upon the incorrect premise that a prior order continuing in effect temporary mutual restraining orders constituted a final determination of the merits of Lees section 527.6 petition. Court also find that substantial evidence supports the injunctive relief granted, and shall affirm the order.
Comments on Earls v. Lee