P. v. Amaya
Miguel Amaya appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by a jury of assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1).)[1] He was sentenced to prison for the middle term of three years. Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that the alleged deadly weapon - a drinking glass - qualified as a deadly weapon. Appellant also contends that the trial court (1) erroneously included allegations of aggravating circumstances in the verdict form, and (2) miscalculated his presentence conduct credit. Court accept respondent's concession that the second contention is meritorious. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Amaya