P. v. Fuller
Fuller contends: (1) the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of his prior commission of acts of domestic violence; (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument; (3) his Marsden[1]motion was improperly denied; and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. In a petition for writ of habeas corpus, which we consider concurrently herewith, Fuller contends that his counsel was ineffective. Court affirm Fullers conviction and deny the writ petition.
Comments on P. v. Fuller