P. v. Ceren
Defendants Jaime Ceren (Ceren) and Rene Soriano (Soriano) appeal from a judgment entered after a jury convicted them and their codefendant Wilber Rodriguez (Rodriguez)[1]of count one, second degree robbery of victim Jorge Paraza (Pen. Code, 211), and count two, assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury against victim Jorge Paraza ( 245, subd. (a)(1)). The jury found true as to both defendants that as to counts one and two a principal in the offense was armed. ( 12022, subd. (a)(1).) The jury found not true that Soriano personally inflicted great bodily injury with respect to counts one and two. ( 12022.7, subd. (a).)
Ceren was sentenced to five years in state prison, which consisted of: (1) the midterm of three years as to count one, plus one year for the firearm enhancement, and (2) one year (one-third the midterm) as to count two, with the firearm enhancement being stayed. Ceren was awarded 397 days of custody credit, which consisted of 265 days of actual custody plus 132 days of conduct credit. Ceren was ordered to pay a $200 restitution fine ( 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a suspended $200 parole revocation fine. (1202.45.) Soriano received an identical sentence.
The abstract of judgment is ordered corrected to reflect that defendants Ceren and Soriano were convicted of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury on count two. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Ceren